Nasb vs esv reformed I have the RSB and find it helpful. My favorite translation. They committed to memory verses KJV, NASB, or NIV, and then their denomination switched to ESV. IMO, it tries for a broader audience. This means that at times the translators will simplify a passage so that it works better at communicating the central idea of the statement. I keep googling verses and reading different translations to understand it. HCSB . NASB 2020 has sparked some controversy, i am late to the discussion, but we have it now, what are your thoughts on it? I Skip to main content. Many in the reformed camp still believe that the reformation text should be used, so automatically that excludes almost all modern versions. The ESV Study Bible has been an amazing tool and was the first Study Bible I used. Older ministers in my church remember the NASB and NIV (1984) when they came out. Maybe it's popular in NAPARC. However, all three are also correct. $88. Members Online • benediss. And, for what it's worth CRs don't hold to the WCF, we hold to the 3FU. I still love the ESV Both of these aren't one single volume (there's an abridged Matthew Henry iirc) but both I'd also highly recommend. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise on While there are other choices available, the top two are generally going to be the ESV Study Bible and The Reformation Study Bible. It's just a solid translation that fits my needs for a modern English translation. Jash Comstock Puritan Board Freshman. It has since become the most visited post If you want the Reformed view, get the Reformation Study Bible. Both the NASB and LSB attempt to be as word for word as possible. I think it will become my church Bible. I also have The ESV Study Bible. But I've always loved how the NASB translates r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, Its revision (NASB) was not the best but was used by Mac et al. The I find the ESV to be a wonderful literal translation that tends to be less "woody" when compared to other literal translations like the NASB. That said, I agree with you that it is a good translation, in many places vastly improved over say the NASB and RSV, but at In "Unveiling the Shift," we critically explore the significant changes between the 2020 New American Standard Bible (NASB) and its 1995 predecessor. It is a literal translation from the Hebrew and Greek languages that incorporates the scholarship of several centuries of I use the ESV (NASB when I got saved in 1980, because that was the translation being used in the [non-Reformed] church I was attending then). C. But I think the ESV is more poetical in the Psalms (I groan at the CSB translation of Psalm 23). I would say the ESV wavers between a formal equivalence translation and an optimum equivalence translation. Contra Marcion Puritan Board Freshman. The ESV uses the word peace, the NASB uses well-being, and the NRSV use whole. The ESV can be a bit dicey on some issues (specifically, it contains hints of Eternal Subordination of the Son). Lockman Foundation even has the old 1977 NASB still available so the 95 version shouldn't be going anywhere. NAB: The official Catholic version, includes the Apocrypha, Neither are necessarily better or worse (it's more a matter of the individual translation), but they do produce different effects. And the fact that it takes great liberties with the text the footnotes more than amply demonstrate. ESV - Wide acceptance in the Reformed community. There’s the NIV, ESV, NASB, KJV, HCSB, NRSV, and a whole lot more (check out this post if you’re looking into the NIV). People who use the ESV exclusively need to discover the help the NLT can provide. In fact, the ESV scored the highest on literalness overall. Our editors explore the NASB vs. NASB churches would be using the NASB for ages now, and the LSB needs more than 2 years of settling down before consideration methinks. Apr 3, 2008 #27 etexas said: Man, how DOES The ESV is a revision of the RSV and the LSB a revision of the NASB1995 Personally, I'd choose NASB 95 over LSB. M. This was written by Starting in 1989, R. The Reformation takes a more solid doctrinal stance where the ESV does not. It looks like this study Most people would rather have a bible based on the NA28 and modern text criticism than one based on the later textus receptus. But the HCSB was the best re: accuracy (only a moderately-educated layman here Sometimes when I’m reading the NASB I read something that makes me pause at how blandly something was written (e. I packer who’s reformed was I rarely use my ESV except for occasionally looking up how a passage is translated or the few times I preached at a CRC church that uses the ESV. NASB for my in depth study, and CSB for more devotional reading. Subsequently, I posted a list of my comparisons. KJV: Traditional, formal, uses Jacobean English, respected for poetic beauty. I prefer the NASB, but still love my grandfather's ASV. But I really value the thought-for-thought translations because the r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. I read the ESV exclusively for 5-6 years and then switched (got a NASB I enjoyed reading In my judgment, the HCSV and ESV are very similar on the dynamic vs literal scale. For my son, I took about a year to decide my preference for the NASB trumps my concern that it is being used less and less. Members Online • mrmtothetizzle. It includes full articles, 400 color pics, 200 maps, and diagrams. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. The biggest opponent of the ESV on here is a member named Rippon, and he claims to be Reformed. Mar 3, 2018 #3 My co-worker just bought one last week. NKJV: The NKJV in my humble opinion is an immensely valuable translation for serious study for a few reasons. If I'm gonna do a deep study on a select group of passages, I use the NASB. Home - Legacy Standard Bible (lsbible. Sproul and featuring commentary by Sproul and other Reformed theologians, emphasizing understanding the Bible’s teachings from a If you like RC Sproul or want to learn Reformed views on Scripture, then the RSB is the best fit. It is also worth noting that the ESV isn't I used to use ESV as my main translation. Jul 19, 2010 #7 I have read the ESV from cover to cover and do not see where it "leans reformed". On the Yahweh/Lord issue: are you sure that the comparison program is actually rendering these correctly? I ask because some "changes" don't seem to be changes at all; for example, Jer 7:2: , for they are not the LORD’sLORD’S. We are dedicated to our historic Creeds and Confessions because we believe they are faithful to the Scriptures. It's what he hears when I'm reading. I like it, but it has too many of Grudem’s fingerprints (which is alright sometimes, but not always). The NASB is seen as the most accurate r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. My pastor preached from it and many fellow church members carried it as well. ESV: Translation Philosophy. NASB vs. However, I know it’s not a popular translation among reformed folks. NASB and NIV. Paraphrase? I just joined a new bible study this evening and one of the This week I decided to go with ESV. Sproul assembled a team of contributors to work on a study Bible edition that would follow a distinctively Reformed perspective. People who are KJV-only need to stop seeing the translation Those in the reconstructionist camp consider modern Bibles such as the ESV, NASB, and NIV to have a better base Greek and Hebrew text and translation methodology than the Reformation era Bibles such as the Geneva Bible and King James Bible. 00 The books are on their way now. I would like some other input on this "slander". I'm curious as to what these issues are, as I've heard ESV recommended by solid, knowledgeable church leaders before. Let's compare the NLT vs ESV Bible translations. The ESV predominantly translates it by "steadfast love", though about 25% of the time it translates it with something else, such as The ESV and the NASB are very similar translations. I really do want to read a scripture translation that is in keeping with original manuscripts. Bible translations fall into two main categories: formal equivalence and dynamic equivalence. I personally think this "Tyndale" lineage still present the most pleasant The ESV thing I think arose because many in the reformed tradition seemed to latch on to the translation. Discussion Good evening, So I'm a bit of an English Bible The Legacy Standard Bible now has an informative Website. That’s why I wanted to offer ESV, NASB(95), and King James. I actually like the ESV but I think it has become overhyped in reformed circles. On the other hand, if there were to be a You are probably looking at the NASB crowd then which is not a lot. 2:13 ESV But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose you as the firstfruits to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth. Also, the Study Bible notes seem to lean more Calvinistic, though it is still fairly middle of the road, as well. org) There is a lot of useful information there including Blog posts, Video library and the goals and translation approach of the impending LSB. I am not surprised there is little interest of churches using it (but plenty of individuals are interested in it). One caution, some of its I purposely googled NASB vs ESV because I’m unhappy with NIV’s most recent revision. Leonhart III. ” But the NIV, Today’s NIV, New Living Translation (NLT), and Revised English Looking at the people involved, however, I have no qualms about either. May 7, The translators do a great job making the message clear without going too far outside of the original wording. Very good study Bible edited by R. The ESV is published by a larger publisher and is more popular But today we’ll start by comparing the NRSV vs NASB vs ESV, and we’ll include a few examples so that you can begin to get a taste for each translation. On a slightly different topic, I find it very fascinating that a small study comissioned by Holman claims the following: while the CSB strikes the highest balance between readability and literalness, the study also claims that the ESV scores higher than the NASB on both readability and literalness. C. 00 $70. The ESV version relies on top biblical scholars (the late J. Members Online • PolyWannaKraken. See their literal vs readable chart. People will say that the NASB translation is more "wooden" but most people who say that haven't really spent a lot of time reading it (I used to be that guy). It looks like they are trying to combine the strengths of both the NASB 77 and 95. Jesus’ words aren’t in red. The KJV, NKJV, ESV, HCSB, and NAS all claim to With ESV vs NASB vs NIV, the NIV is the least literal of the three. Our in-depth analysis reveals that the 2020 edition leans towards readability and dynamic equivalence at the cost of strict literalness and faithfulness to the original texts. I own several Zondervan thinline (NASB and NIV) bibles that don’t seem to have this problem, or at least not to the extent as the Crossway. I cannot find that. All Schuyler Bibles use only the finest materials in crafting its Bibles. ADMIN MOD NASB '95 or NKJV . NASB 2020 is still a very literal translation, but it updates the English so that it sounds more familiar to modern ears (including gender usage, My personal favorite 3 translations are (in no particular order) are as follows: NKJV. ESV – Introduction. 40. Seeing a church uses the ESV isn't going to make me flee from the building, but it will make me more alert about how they frame things. ESV. The ESV is the best of the modern English translations, so it makes sense. ESV Reformation Study Bible. I knew that John Piper and Tim Keller, both pastors and authors that I deeply respect have switched over to the ESV. In the end the version you choose to study from is a personal choice. ESV vs. For maximum NT fidelity I would go with What does everyone think of the NASB 2020 changes? It seems they are trying to be gender neutral, however isn't this what killed the TNIV only a few Skip to main content. The new testament is better, but still retains much of the archaic language ("would that", e. That's not a problem for most PB readers, but it is a concern for some. [2] In 1995, Thomas Nelson (now HarperCollins) published the New Geneva Study Bible (featuring the Bible text of the New King James Version); the name of the edition was changed to Reformation Study Bible in 1998. Log In / Sign Up; Just because the KJV translators were fine with other translations available to them at the time, does not at all mean they would be fine with an ESV, or any other modern translation for that matter. This landmark resource, edited by Dr. Differences between CSB and ESV include their translation of specific terms such as “living creatures” vs “great sea creatures,” word choices highlighting varied theological interpretations. If one makes use of the KJV, NKJV, NASB, CSB, and ESV they are using solid and reliable Bible ESV Reformation Study Bible. This comparison between formal translations of the Tyndale tradition will begin with the passage of Isaiah 53:5. Anyone here use it? What are your thoughts? I’m intrigued if there’s value in having a more literal word-for-word translation than the ESV. IMO, it tries for a About NASB vs ESV. We will find the best fit for you by comparing the readability, translation differences, target audience, and more. CSB. ADMIN MOD CSB vs NIV vs ESV . Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Expand user menu Open settings menu. ] I grew up in NASB and still find it accurate and easy to read. That can be useful, but it makes the text far more complicated to understand in some areas because Greek sounds like how Yoda talks (the word order seldom matters because the I've been a NASB guy for years and I can't change now. NASB seems interesting, but ESV seems more like what I'm looking for and I'm not really up to decide between NASB 1995 and 2020. Further, both are extremely pastoral and very understandable. Since then I think I’ve used the ESV maybe 3 times? I wasn’t properly Reformed before getting the RSB but now I’m much more Reformed and have been attending a confessional church (go figure). As such, they attempt to strike a middle way that neither angers the dispensationalists, Weslyans, or the I have both, and both are great. That is why I The ESV is preferred by those wanting closer adherence to original texts with formal English and is popular within Reformed tradition circles. Purchase the RSB now and use it for home study and church use. Recently I was reading my ESV and was struck by their translation choice in 2 Thess. ADMIN MOD Do I get ESV study Bible, CSB study bible, Reformation study bible, CSB study bible for Schuyler also offers the KJV, ESV, NASB, and NLT versions. • The distinction between Bibles based on the Eclectic Text tradition vs. See on Amazon using the exact ISBN See on Christianbook using If you really want to read a translation that is very different from the ESV and the NIV that'll have to take you a bit farther out from what makes up the greater majority of the common English translations, because the ESV shares the same translation family tree as the LSB, NRSV, NASB, RSV, ASV, KJV. NKJV: NKJV Study Bible, offering comprehensive study aids and notes. :detective: :detective: :detective: :detective: What gender issues in ESV? I've used ESV a fair bit when looking things up online, but my physical Bible is NASB. On the other side, those in the Received Text camp consider the base Greek and Hebrew text and translation I seriously doubt we'll see the NASB challenge the KJV's numbers again, but I think the recent release of the very popular MacArthur Study Bible in the NASB will give it a boost. I give the NASB the edge, for the source texts it is based on, which in general I've come to prefer, and for the translation itself. Also, the RSB used Thanks Iain. Its philosophical theory for translation is important to me, being a formal equivalent translation, which is “word for word. Members Online • landonjd18. If you consider yourself more in the “broader reformed” tradition then the standard ESV Study Bible might be a better fit for you. When the ESV first came out in 2001 I started an Excel spreadsheet to record passages where I believed one to be superior to the other. Articles are edited r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. I think most people find the ESV more readable than the NASB. Use Bible Verses by Comparison to read all translations side by side. If you go with the NASB make sure you get the 1995 Bible translation differences between KJV VS NASB. Both the English Standard Version (ESV) and the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) are revisions of the Revised Standard Version that dates to the 1950’s. For comparison: NASB: [waiting for the moving of the waters; 4 for an angel of the Lord went down at certain seasons into the pool and stirred up the water; whoever then first, after the stirring up of the water, stepped in was made well from whatever disease with which he was afflicted. When looking for a new Bible for yourself or as a gift, There are so many translations of the Bible available these days, it can be difficult just deciding where to jump in. I recently purchased a NKJV by Thomas Nelson: hardback, two columns per page, each verse starts a new line - and only about $15. NASB – The New American Standard Bible was first published in 1971. How may we help? Looking for something specific? Have questions about a resource? We’re CSB vs ESV or NASB? I was gifted a KJV Bible by a friend when I shared that I am a new Christian and asked for Bible recs. It was based on a 1971 Revised Standard Version. Are those the main reasons one would chose one over the other? Some people in the other thread were saying OK, I use the AV and the NASB for CT readings, I work out with an OPC friend who ALWAYS pokes fun at the NASB saying it has strong Dispie leanings. I also like the generosity of the ESV's intellectual property rights. Last edited: May 7, 2008. com states, “Schuyler Bibles are printed and bound in the Netherlands in one of the finest book binderies in Europe, Jongbloed. But that's just me. April 11, 2014 October 28, 2014 / William F. I was aware of this - I grew up in a KJV only background so spent time studying the merits of different Bible translations. Both NASB and ESV are on the translation of words side, but NASB is a bit further along the spectrum IIRC, Both are revisions of a prior translation. For some of the OT poetry I prefer the NKJV. Both aim to be more literal than the NIV, which as a preacher I appreciate (I preached from the NIV from 1992 - 2006). NKJV - one prefers the underlying NT text. Will see I think I saw that John Macarthur was unhappy with the 2020 NASB update so he, with some others, did the LSB Bible. That being said, RC Sproul's Reformation Study Bible, which has a lot heavier Reformed Calvinistic leaning, came in both ESV and NKJV, and people Your choices for #1 are primarily KJV or NKJV for a majority text type and everything else for the CT. I can't comment on the study notes but what I will say is that the map . So I'd be very comfortable switching to the ESV. Origin CSB – In 2004 the Holman When it comes to greek, the english words chosen tend to be more accurate in the NASB than ESV. May 4, 2012 #3 jwithnell said: Aren't both the NASB and ESV from the same translation methodology? Click to expand Both are literal, but For whatever reason, I never really connected well with the NASB as a primary translation I tried, but just couldn't do it (gasps do I dare say that here among my reformed brethren ) However, be that as it may, I still consider the NASB to be in my personal top 5, though I prefer the NJKV, ESV, and CSB over it. While you are probably not going to be using the Catholic version, that probably is a reasonable indication that there are not translation choices that would be odius to Catholics. But I’m looking for something that I can read at home maybe with another Can't say I'd agree entirely. However, the NASB tradition claims to be a consistent formal equivalence translation. " If you've stretched the term far enough to include Craig Bloomberg, I don't think there's much to worry about. I read through: ESV, NASB, NIV (1984), NLT, KJV, Young's Right now, we are a denomination that primarily uses the ESV and probably will for another 20-30 years until the next modern translation comes out. Tbh, this may not matter much, since these aren't theologically focused study Bibles. For over 30 years I have used and trusted the NASB (New American Standard Update) and I still do. The notes were adapted from the well-regarded, middle of the road, evangelical, NIV Study Bible. ) DMcFadden Puritanboard Commissioner. That being said, they’re both excellent. But Luke 23:43 NASB Putting it all together. I wish at times the ESV wasn't so slavish to the RSV. com LLC (Amazon. Formal equivalence, seen in the King James Version and ESV, aims for a close match to the The ESV old testament is very, very similar to the old testament RSV. Any translations in the S Branch (ASV, RSV, NASB, NRSVue, ESV) will be a solid translation and well worth your investment. I can't see the ESV becoming the standard translation even among those who are Reformed any time soon. Members Online • snpolymorphism. When funds permit, obtain an ESV Study Bible and keep it at home for reference. Just not a giant brick of NASB. All in all I agree with Lane. Basically, I'm The ESV scores three grade levels harder than the CSB (10th vs 7th). ESV – This version is highly readable. It’s a beautiful Bible, but I’m having a hard time understanding it. com/watc r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. Reply reply THSTJ • I am crazy about my NASB! I am an older lady, but am able to change and learn new things, just so you know, but my church uses the NIV, and I just dislike it so much! My main beef is that the pronouns of God are not capitalized and this feels like a slap in the face to me every The comments are sparser than the ESV Study Bible, but solid and uniformly Reformed (without a perceived need to be "balanced"). ADMIN MOD Thoughts on LSB? Discussion It's been a while since the Legacy Standard Bible was Reformed Baptista; Doctrinal Standards; M’Cheyne Bible Reading Plan; Series; The Fellowship; Search. But that’s a matter of personal preference. The NASB, ESV, KJV, and NKJV preserve this metaphor in 1 Thessalonians 2:12 as “walk in a manner worthy of God” or “walk worthy of God. Part I may be viewed here: https://www. Both the ESV and the NAS will serve you well. Second, hesed is notoriously difficult to translate into English. I really disliked the ESV and have too many qualms over dynamic equivalence. But NASB: NASB Study Bible, features in-depth study notes and articles. This basically leaves you with the NASB or ESV for formal translation and the ESV is just better at marketing and reads better than the NASB. Reformed? Not always. for the dynamic equivalent type; and Living Bible and The Message for the paraphrastic ones. Useful Links . The ESV publishers have waged a tremendous marketing campaign and in a few short years The account of the woman caught in adultery is bracketed by the NIV, NASB, ESV, HCSB, and NET, indicating those versions all believe this testing of Jesus is not Scripture at all. com) $25. Ryle for free online if you want to see what they're like before buying. ADMIN MOD How do you guys feel about the CSB? Question I know this question was asked back in English speaking world, both the ESV and NASB are excellent translations directly from the original languages. or majority, of Reformed Christians in the US use the ESV I don't think this is true. It is suitable The NASB does use the Critical Text in the New Testament, but it tends to be a little more conservative in retaining readings than the ESV and some other newer translations. ) They took out a lot of the liberal bias, but otherwise the ESV is pretty similar to the RSV. ESV, NASB, NIV, RSV - no losers in this list. This gives the NASB the title for “most accurate English translation” at the expense of readability and comprehension. For preaching: ESV For translation help: NASB (NASB often follows the very word order of the original, which is great when you are in seminary, but makes you sound like a robot if you are reading it aloud. But I like the ESV for a smoother read. ” First Corinthians 2:13 speaks of “words” taught by the Spirit. The choice between ESV, NASB or NKJV as the only options feels like the OP is really only choosing from 3 very similar translations in which none are really known for flow or readability Since English has morphed so much in 500 years, most of us prefer the ESV as a good/accurate translation that follows the best Greek with a solid philosophy (formal ESV: Literally accurate, slightly formal English, popular for personal study. This is despite the fact that the NASB sometimes renders phrases in a more common English idiom than will the NKJV or even the ESV in the same passage. Board Rules r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. Field-trained archaeologists write notes. The Hebrew word for שָׁלוֹם (shalom, “peace”) is traditionally rendered as peace. The The NET is without question inferior to both the ESV and the NASB, 1995, and it is not suitable for a study Bible for anyone with a 7th grade or higher proficiency in reading due to the unwarranted liberties that it takes with the texts that it is a translation of. The ESV's popularity up until now overwhelmingly seems to be in Reformed or at least Reformed-leaning circles, with most evangelicals appearing to opt for the NKJV or NIV. May 20, 2009 #4 As Kevin said, "literal" is in the eye of the beholder. For question #2, you have KJB, NKJV, ESV, NASB for the more formal correspondence type; the NIV, NLT, God's Word, etc. A few years ago, however, I spent hours in a bookstore looking for a version and a study layout that would appeal to a very literary (and lost) friend. I'm not a native english speaker and have been looking for a good translation that would give me a nice balance between translation philosophies and I'm heavily inclined to ESV. The KJV and NKJV both consider this • About eight different translations: the KJV, NASB, LSB, CSB, ICB, ESV, NET and NIV, as well as the MacArthur Study Bible and the Geneva Bible. I prefer NASB or ESV. As the webpage at evangelicalbible. After finishing this I decided to change from ESV To NASB & CSB. The Archeology Study Bible may be more Reformed in its perspective, while the Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible might be less theologically specific. If you want a really in depth analysis of the NASB and Bible translation generally, see my previous comments here and here. g. It might also be translated I use the NAS updated (95), and also others from time to time like the NIV, the NET Bible, and the NKJV. I have an NAS and an NIV study Bible that I use the most right now. That would require actually understanding what these men believed about Scripture and applying that to translations such as the ESV, NASB, and NIV To take an obvious example, The ESV Study Bible (and. . Translation Philosophies. From paper to natural grain Goatskin – the Schuyler label has determined to 1. I read the KJV to my boys every now and again because they should know that literary tradition. I had decided in December to read the NASB translation in my 2014 reading program. No Yoda readings yet have I found:lol:. I have both the ESV Study Bible and the Reformation Study Bible and use them both. 1; 2; 3; First Prev 3 of 3 I suppose this is because the NASB was the version I was introduced to when I came to the reformed faith making this the version I cut my reformed teeth on. For example, it's dogmatic dedication to a "word for word" approach to translation is actually bad in I have both and prefer Reformation. The Spirit of the Reformation Study Bible is the best for Reformed commentary. I now preach from the ESV, largely because far more Reformed people have it than the HCSV. ADMIN MOD The NASB 2020 has been released A few weeks ago Lockman released a few Even though I prefer the NASB to the NIV that I regularly use, the ESV certainly has its strengths with one being with the growing number of academic texts that are utilising the ESV as their base translation. However, their translation teams and targeted audiences Of those, ESV is the only one that I know of where a Catholic version exists or is pending. While the ESV prioritizes a balance between accuracy and readability, the NASB leans toward a more literal rendering. Published by Crossway, the ESV Study Bible has been around for a few years already. even better, the Reformation Study Bible) are far superior to the CSB Study Bible from a Reformed perspective; the latter has a few Reformed contributors, including myself, but it isn't a Reformed Study Bible. Introduction. NASB: The NASB reflects the most recent textual criticism and manuscript evidence, providing a more up-to-date translation of the original texts. It has become popular among conservative Reformed denoms of the theology There have been some good discussions on that - links below. I didn't buy ESV study bible. The ESV, published in 2001, aims I did read some other threads that pitted NKJV vs ESV and it seemed the two primary reasons that one would choose one over the other is: 1. Already, we have a The ESV is the go-to Bible for many evangelical Reformed Christians. The 95 version will still be available, so I'm not sure why MacArthur decided to make a new version if he liked the 95. I'm so used to the Reformation Study Bible (2015, ESV). Prev. After reading what you and others 18 votes, 15 comments. You can Personally I think some of the criticism of the NASB is overblown, especially the 1995 update, but overall it does not flow quite as well as the NKJV or ESV. Members Online • ced14986. Much prefer I reading the ESV on Luke I do. Of the several NASB editions, I go with the 95 update, although the new LSB spin-off is interesting. It has the best features of any study Bible I'd recommend. But when reading whole sets of chapters or whole books in one sitting, I use the ESV. I’ve never read the NASB but have a friend who picked up an LSB. Sorry. It seems really unlikely that all of these specific changes would be made so inconsistently - for example Lord GOD to LORD God in Not sure if this is in the correct location, but I'm curious as to which Study Bibles you use and would recommend for having solid Reformed commentaries. Differences. I don't think you can go wrong with any of these translations. ;) Reading the NASB on Romans at the minute I am, and to be truthful I will be glad when I finish. They put the ESV and NASB close together in terms of literalness https: The Puritan Board is a forum dedicated to the discussion of Christian theology in a Confessionally Reformed context. I bought several copies trying to find the perfect binding, font size, etc. Thread starter etexas; Start date Apr 2, 2008; Status Not open for further replies. It was first published in 1980 but is still widely used nowadays as it’s very comprehensive and easy to use. There are quite a few people who love reading such an accurate translation, so the NASB has a strong following. When looking for a new Bible for yourself or as a gift, comparing the different Bible versions is an r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. Let me begin by making a prefacing statement. The HCSB is essentially literal Many reformed groups are still using the KJV, others are using the NKJV, some the NASB or ESV. So why choose the NASB over the ESV? The NASB is still highly regarded by academics and is still a solid translation. The Christian Standard Bible (CSB), published in 2017, is a major revision and replacement of the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB), which was first published as a full Bible in 2004 and revised in 2009. They are not the top rank of most recent study Bibles in my opinion (cf. com) $12. I found the article and some of the comments to be very useful. All of the churches that we have attended over the past few years PCA or Reformed Baptist have also switched to Yes. 00 $54. There is also the time factor. Search for: NASB vs. Members Online • 1006xx. The NASB has a reading level of grade 11+ and age 16+, although the last two revisions have made it easier to read. I prefer the newer English - still wishing the NASB translators had gotten rid of the Thees & Thous, but that aside, the NASB is still easier for me to read. Study Bible verses using NIV, KJV, ESV, and all versions found on one page. r/Reformed A chip A close button. I have read that the SB for Presbyterian reformed would be the Dr Sproul Reformation one, the Esv SB for reformed baptists, and the Zondervan Niv Study Bible for Conservative Christians. Bible translators must make an important decision on whether to translate “word for word” (formal equivalence) or “thought for thought” (dynamic equivalence) I agree. Most of the translations have some positives, though I prefer ESV and NASB the most. I consider it an excellent translation, though I find Sadly, I think the ESV is the future and is being used in Reformed circles more and more frequently while the NASB fads in usage, so the ESV would be of more value as a primary text. Most of the major conservative seminaries (especially the Reformed ones) use the NASB or ESV in serious exegetical study because they are literal translations, not dynamic equivalents. NASB 95 is well-tested and trusted by many (though it does still employ some language that, while not quite archaic, does lean older than that found in other modern versions). 88 Nelson Reference Bible, KJV Edition Sold by Amazon. You can find both Matthew Henry and J. In contrast, the CSB team favored a more interpretive “thought for thought” translation style. NIV and NRSV are popular in Continental Reformed churches. HCSB vs. When I compare Genesis 3:16 in NASB and ESV I don't see any differences in gender issues. The short version is that the NASB is a good translation, like almost any English translation, but it is by no means the "best", and it certainly has its own problems. But except the articles, the rest of the features are generic Zondervan. I buy paper copies as presents. The NASB has some long sentences going on for two or three verses, which makes it difficult to The Ryrie NASB Study Bible is one of the most popular NASB Study Bibles there is. There is no other article this extensive on To clear up the typos and technical glitches in this video, I repaired it and broke it into two parts. The ESV Study Bible is HUGE and a bit unwieldy (in my opinion). I like the CSB in the book of Proverbs. Here are 11 major differences to know! Let's get into the New Living Translation and English Standard Version! The NLT (New Living Translation) and the ESV (English NASB is the most word-for-word translation out there I think. The Reformationis I would suggest the ESV Study Bible for a more broadly Reformed (with a bit of Reformed Baptist flavor) perspective. I couldn't remember the difference so I went to look it up. Mexdeaf New Member. I have not purchased an ESV as of yet but keep seeing positive comments here on it. The ESV is supposed to be in the stream of the KJV and rejects capitalizing deity I am so thankful for my friend's question about the ESV vs. ADMIN MOD ESV or NKJV? Hi guys- I know the propensity on here is to favor the Elect Standard I prefer the ESV and NASB, and of them, the ESV. I just attended a retreat, the topic is "the inerrancy of bible", given by Dr Luke Lu, a Chinese reformed pastor in San Jose. So, which translation should you choose between the KJV vs NLT vs NASB? It ultimately comes down to personal preference and the purpose of your reading. NASB Zondervan Study Bible Sold by Amazon. ESV is the most enjoyable translation to read, I just wish there was italicization on words added for context, and capitalization I have a KJV and ESV I use primarily. Example give. The ESV Study Bible has its merits, but is not devoted to giving a Reformed view on all the Notes. Thanks guys! Edit: it does not have to be a thinline. This is great you want to dive deeper into the word! I’m sure a lot of what he writes is fantastic. Members Online • googlepixelfan. But SOTRSB is superior in notes. The LSB often goes back to the more literal NASB 77. Hardcover. The Reformation Study Bible is your best option for intentionally Reformed notes in ESV. However, I got my Reformation Study Bible more recent after moving more towards “historic” Reformed Theology and I’ve hardly ever used my standard ESV Study Bible since. The ESV and NASB translations are both highly regarded English versions of the Bible. I like NASB and don't find it awkward at all, but it's been my primary version since I was a teenager and my memory verses are all NASB, so that's probably why I am so comfortable with it . One of the most obvious is its excellent supply of marginal notes of the thousands of textual variations in both the OT and especially in the NT. The Spirit of the Reformation Study Bible is only available as ebook on Amazon but is an amazing resource keyed to the 1984 NIV. Most of the major translations are fine for that. The ESV has discovered that lost punctuation mark, the exclamation point, which introduces the element of human emotion, making the text seem far more natural and alive. A while back, a friend asked me why I like the NASB more than the ESV. The NKJV is known for its accuracy and clear language, with a higher reading level than most books. Some things I don't like about the ESV: It seems to me the ESV doesn't offset words added for clarity in italics to hide how literal it really is, where as the KJV, NKJV and NASB all offset those added words. I love the way their bibles look, the layout of the text, and of course, the ESV translation. The ESV is a revision of the RSV and the LSB a revision of the NASB1995. Robert Snow I have the ESV study Bible and I used it thoroughly before getting the RSB as a gift. Add. 1 This paper is a Both are great trannies. It could use some more clarity in places. This month I finished a reading plan where I read through the Bible in 4 translations (ESV, NASB, CSB, NKJV), and I used 2 others in the OT (KJV NIV84). The ESB has its merits, but is not devoted to giving a Reformed view on all the Notes. ESV – This version was originally created in 2001. Very helpful text notes and theological articles and it has Reformed confessions and catechisms. Plus, you aren’t making a lifetime commitment. ADMIN MOD Should I get a Reformation Study Bible? Question Hey everyone. NLT: Life r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. youtube. DMcFadden Puritanboard Commissioner. But they're all good. Prefer I it or the Version New King James. It seems this is even more true for the LSB than the NASB 95. Should you buy an ESV? Maybe. I prefer to read the poetic books in the KJV/NKJV, and appreciate NASB for in depth word study. Sproul with commentary The English Standard Version (ESV) and the New Living Translation (NLT) are two distinct translations of the Bible that provide different approaches to presenting the biblical text. My concern is the lack of contribution from others. R. Luke 14:16’s “big dinner” in the NASB compared to “great banquet” in NIV, ESV, or “great supper” in older In this article, we will look over the CSB and the ESV translation of the Bible. But it's keyed to NIV 1984. $68. In the pulpit, I use the ESV; however, in my study, I tend to use the ESV and CSB together, as they compliment each other wonderfully. The Whenever I prep for preaching a sermon, I like to reach through the passage a LOT. The real issue is: will you study the one you have? No Bible is of any value if you do r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. For personal study I would defer to the reader. Members Online • Wolfabc. Hello, I'm trying to find a translation that is easy to read, so The NASB, completed in 1971 and updated in 1995, is a revision of the American Standard Version of 1901. The ESV translation team opted for a slightly more literal “word for word” approach. Members Online • [deleted] ADMIN MOD Literal Translation vs. NIV: NIV Study Bible, popular for its detailed notes and maps. CSB vs. I evaluated them based on When I embraced reformed theology and joined the Presbyterian Church in America in 2007, the ESV seemed to be the perfect fit. r/Reformed exists to be a place where reformed believers, in a broader understanding of the term, can come together, unified by a clear Gospel witness, to exhort one another, spur one another on intellectually in reformed theology, and discuss doctrine. I think reformed people really value word-for-word translation more than thought-for-thought. I think the ESV is popular in reformed baptist circles, who also, don't hold to the WCF. Fierce proponents of the The NASB brackets John 5:3b-4; the ESV footnotes those verses. beloved7 Puritan Board Freshman. To get to my point, it seems to me there is no advantage having a NASB 95 because the ESV fills this niche of a literal translation that is more 'dynamic' than a wooden translation. I think it’s beneficial to have different translations for study and language purposes. This is not a dig at Crossway. ESV Bibles so you can understand the major differences between each translation. B. The NASB is more literal in the sense of sticking to the original language syntax and nuances and often retaining idioms. Of the 3, it consistently provides unabashed Reformed views. Frankly, I will always have my NASB, and I will always keep my ASV - but I have been leaning towards the ESV of late. A lot of modern commentaries can be very academic and go above most people's heads, so The translation is ESV. ESV Study Bible, Reformation Study Bible). ADMIN MOD Most accurate French Bible translations? / French equivalent(s) of NRSV and NASB? Actually that's not quite accurate. People who use the NIV exclusively need to also see the value of the NASB. 2. Now, it is true that one can stretch the word "Reformed" pretty far, but then you've got a situation where almost all of the ESV translators are "reformed" because almost all of the top conservative evangelical Bible scholars are "reformed. This is a major reason for not using versions such as the NKJV or Message as they will probably never have any such books linked to them - why bother. English Standard Version (ESV): Translation Philosophy: ESV: The ESV, like the NASB, follows a formal equivalence approach but aims for a balance between literal translation and The Reformation Study Bible is carefully crafted to equip Christians for a lifetime of in-depth Bible study as they seek to know God’s truth and live for His glory. Sproul. I had a friend who Personally I prefer translations in the Tyndale tradition, hence I use the ESV. Other translations I like are the NRSV and NLT.
xmqdq jecoj uox oxkwox rhcua nyeq gexiouys ifq ykvjxq tecx